Usefulness and performance of the vereckei-2 and brugada algorithms in the diagnosis of idiopathic ventricular tachycardia

Authors

  • Raimundo Carmona Puerta Hospital Provincial Universitario Cardiocentro Ernesto Guevara
  • Elibet Chávez González Hospital Provincial Universitario Cardiocentro Ernesto Guevara
  • Fredy J. Rosa Fabián Escuela Latinoamericana de Medicina
  • Ramiro R. Ramos Ramírez Hospital Provincial Universitario Cardiocentro Ernesto Guevara
  • Gustavo Padrón Peña Hospital Provincial Universitario Cardiocentro Ernesto Guevara
  • Juan M. Cruz Elizundia Hospital Provincial Universitario Cardiocentro Ernesto Guevara
  • Arnaldo Rodríguez León Hospital Universitario Celestino Hernández Robau

Keywords:

ventricular tachycardia, algorithms, eletrocardiography

Abstract

Introduction and Objectives: There are algorithms such as Brugada and Vereckei-2 for diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia, but they have not been explored in specific series of patients with idiopathic ventricular tachycardia. The purpose of this research was to identify in our series, by simple analysis, the scheme of greater diagnostic performance of the Brugada and Vereckei-2 algorithms. Method: Retrospective and descriptive study in 15 consecutive patients presenting with idiopathic ventricular tachycardia, confirmed by electrophysiological study and other tests at the Cardiac Electrophysiology Service of Cardiocentro "Ernesto Che Guevara" in Santa Clara, Cuba, between January 2004 - December 2007. Results: Both algorithms diagnosed 100% of cases. In patients with right ventricle outflow tract ventricular tachycardia, the Brugada algorithm diagnosed 50% of cases in step 1, and 83.3% combined with Step 3. The Vereckei-2 algorithm in the first two steps did not diagnose any right ventricle outflow tract ventricular tachycardia. In fascicular right ventricle outflow tract ventricular tachycardia, the Brugada algorithm step 1 only diagnosed 11.1% of cases and none in step 2. The Vereckei-2 algorithm, step 2, has a high diagnostic performance for fascicular ventricular tachycardia: 88.9% of cases. Conclusions: The Vereckei-2 algorithm has greater usefulness in fascicular ventricular tachycardia, with a high diagnostic performance in a single step (step 2). Brugada algorithm, despite having lower diagnostic performance in a single step, has greater usefulness in the diagnosis of right ventricle outflow tract ventricular tachycardia by combining steps 1 and 3.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Berruezo A, Zeljko HM, Bartrons J, Mayol J, Prada F, Brugada J. Defibrillation threshold decrease with the supradiaphragmatic extracardiac implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation technique. Europace. 2010;12(11):1649-51.

Schneider HE, Kriebel T, Jung K, Gravenhorst VD, Paul T. Catheter ablation of idiopathic left and right ventricular tachycardias in the pediatric population using noncontact mapping. Heart Rhythm. 2010;7(6):731-9.

Yokoshiki H, Mitsuyama H, Ueno M, Tsutsui H. Idiopathic reentrant right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia with presystolic potential of central pathway. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010;21(10):1174-7.

Ceresnak SR, Liberman L, Avasarala K, Tanel R, Motonaga KS, Dubin AM. Are wide complex tachycardia algorithms applicable in children and patients with congenital heart disease? J Electrocardiol. 2010;43(6):694-700.

Brugada P, Brugada J, Mont L, Smeets J, Andries EW. A new approach to the differential diagnosis of a regular tachycardia with a wide QRS complex. Circulation. 1991;83(5):1649-59.

Vereckei A, Duray G, Szénási G, Altemose GT, Miller JM. Application of a new algorithm in the differential diagnosis of wide QRS complex tachycardia. Eur Heart J. 2007;28(5):589-600.

Vereckei A, Duray G, Szénási G, Altemose GT, Miller JM. New algoritm usin only lead aVR for differential diagnosis of wide QRS complex tachycardia. Heart Rhythm. 2008;5(1):89-98.

Kireyev D, Arkhipov MV, Zador ST, Paris JA, Boden WE. Clinical utility of aVR-the neglected electrocardiographic lead. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2010;15(2):175-80.

Alzand BS, Crijns HJ. Diagnostic criteria of broad QRS complex tachycardia: decades of evolution. Europace. 2011;13(4):465-72.

Sethi KK, Singh B, Kalra GS, Mohan JC, Jolly N, Arora R, et al. Verapamil responsive ventricular tachycardia: clinical and electrophysiologic characteristics. Indian Heart J. 1991;43(6):437-43.

Frey B, Kreiner G, Fritsch S, Veit F, Gössinger HD. Successful treatment of idiopathic left ventricular outflow tract tachycardia by catheter ablation or minimally invasive surgical cryoablation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000;23(5):870-6.

Published

2012-09-16

How to Cite

1.
Carmona Puerta R, Chávez González E, Rosa Fabián FJ, Ramos Ramírez RR, Padrón Peña G, Cruz Elizundia JM, et al. Usefulness and performance of the vereckei-2 and brugada algorithms in the diagnosis of idiopathic ventricular tachycardia. CorSalud [Internet]. 2012 Sep. 16 [cited 2025 Oct. 2];4(3):180-4. Available from: https://revcorsalud.sld.cu/index.php/cors/article/view/1225

Issue

Section

BRIEF ARTICLES

Categories