Behavior of mortality due to aortic dissection in Cuba
Abstract
Introduction: Aortic dissection is a disease of poor prognosis, with a high mortality rate, even when it is diagnosed early and the adequate surgery is performed.
Objectives: To describe some characteristics of the patients who died due to aortic dissection in Cuba.
Method: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted. It included 888 de-ceased patients with a diagnosis of aortic dissection, who were registered in the Automated Registration and Control System of Anatomical Pathology (SARCAP, for its acronym in Spanish) in Cuba, from 1962 to 2004.
Results: The age groups from 65 to 74 and from 75 to 84 years predominated, with 266 (30.0%) and 210 (23.6%) deaths, respectively. The largest number of deaths [496 (55.9%)] occurred in the first 24 hours. Stanford type A aortic dissection was the most frequent type [535 diagnoses were made (61.1%)]. The most common underlying cause of death was aortic dissection itself (61.6 %) and the most common direct cause of death was hemopericardium (43.9%). The rate of diagnostic agreement was 33.5 % in the underlying cause and 28.8 % in direct cause.
Conclusions: During the 42 years covered by the study, the patients who died from aortic dissection in Cuba predominantly had Stanford type A dissections, were over 55 years of age and had a hospital stay of less than 2 months. The largest number of deaths occurred in the first 24 hours and the rate of diagnostic agreement was low.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.