Prolongation of ventricular depolarization and repolarization in patients with cardiac surgery
Abstract
Introduction: Cardiac surgery involves a series of aggressive mechanical and chemical elements that affect the cardiac muscle; which may be shown by the electrocardiogram.
Objectives: To evaluate whether electrocardiographic measurements reflecting ventricular depolarization and repolarization are prolonged after cardiac surgery.
Method: We studied 51 patients with cardiac surgery who underwent an electrocardiogram before and after surgery. The difference between QT, QTc, QT dispersion, TPEAK-TEND interval (TP-TE), TP-TE dispersion and QRS duration, before and after surgery was compared using the T test.
Results: Electrocardiogram after surgery showed significantly higher QTc values, QT dispersion, TP-TE, TP-TE dispersion and QRS duration (p<0.006). The uncorrected QT interval was greater in the postoperative electrocardiogram, without statistically significant difference (p=0.49).
Conclusions: Myocardial aggression during cardiac surgery modifies the ventricular electrical activity and is verified by the significantly prolonged depolarization and repolarization measurements. These variables could be used in future studies as predictors of adverse events in this procedure.
Downloads
References
1. Desborough JP. The stress response to trauma and surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2000;85(1):109-17.
2. Bazett HC. An analysis of the time-relations of electrocardiograms. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 1997;2(2):177-194.
3. Rautaharju PM, Surawicz B, Gettes LS, Bailey JJ, Childers R, Deal BJ, et al. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram. Part IV: The ST segment, T and U waves, and the QT interval: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society: endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. Circulation. 2009;119(10):e241-250.
4. Day CP, McComb JM, Campbell RW. QT dispersion: an indication of arrhythmia risk in patients with long QT intervals. Br Heart J. 1990;63(6):342-4.
5. Maury P, Sacher F, Gourraud JB, Pasquié JL, Raczka F, Bongard V, et al. Increased Tpeak-Tend interval is highly and independently related to arrhythmic events in Brugada syndrome. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12(12):2469-76.
6. Toma M, Marstrand P, Holmenlund K, Umar S, Wanscher M, Pehrson S, et al. QT interval prolongation after cardiac surgery; an interesting biological phenomenon or a clinical problem? Data from the Prolonqit Study. J Clin Toxicol [Internet]. 2014 [citado 30 Ener 2018];4(3):195. Disponible en: https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/interesting-biological-phenomenon-or-a-clinical-problem-data-from-the-prolonqit-study-2161-0495.1000-195.pdf
7. Yan GX, Shimizu W, Antzelevitch C. Characteristics and distribution of M cells in arterially perfused canine left ventricular wedge preparations. Circulation. 1998;98(18):1921-7.
8. Biry M, Schurr U, Ritter S, Baenziger K, Zollinger A, Genoni M. High incidence of severely prolonged QT interval after cardiac surgery. Crit Care. 2010;14(Supl 1):P134 [Resumen].
9. Pasquier M, Pantet O, Hugli O, Pruvot E, Buclin T, Waeber G, et al. Prevalence and determinants of QT interval prolongation in medical inpatients. Intern Med J. 2012;42(8):933-40.
10. Tisdale JE, Wroblewski HA, Overholser BR, Kingery JR, Trujillo TN, Kovacs RJ. Prevalence of QT interval prolongation in patients admitted to cardiac care units and frequency of subsequent administration of QT interval-prolonging drugs: a prospective, observational study in a large urban academic medical center in the US. Drug Saf. 2012;35(6):459-70.
11. Antzelevitch C, Shimizu W, Yan GX, Sicouri S. Cellular basis for QT dispersion. J Electrocardiol. 1998;30(Supl 1):168-75.
12. Zayas Molina R, Díaz Garriga RE, Dorantes Sánchez M. Dispersión del intervalo QT: un predictor de arritmias ventriculares malignas. Rev Cubana Cardiol Cir Cardiovasc. [Internet]. 2000 [citado 30 Ene 2018];14(2):116-23. Disponible en: http://revcardiologia.sld.cu/index.php/revcardiologia/article/view/496/423
13. Bachmann TN, Skov MW, Rasmussen PV, Graff C, Pietersen A, Lind B, et al. Electrocardiographic Tpeak-Tend interval and risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality: Results from the Copenhagen ECG study. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13(4):915-24.
14. Castro Hevia J, Antzelevitch C, Tornés Bárzaga F, Dorantes Sánchez M, Dorticós Balea F, Zayas Molina R, et al. Tpeak-Tend and Tpeak-Tend dispersion as risk factors for ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation in patients with the Brugada syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47(9):1828-34.
15. Rosenthal TM, Stahls PF, Abi Samra FM, Bernard ML, Khatib S, Polin GM, et al. T-peak to T-end interval for prediction of ventricular tachyarrhythmia and mortality in a primary prevention population with systolic cardiomyopathy. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12(8):1789-97.
16. Panikkath R, Reinier K, Uy-Evanado A, Teodorescu C, Hattenhauer J, Mariani R, et al. Prolonged Tpeak-to-Tend interval on the resting ECG is associated with increased risk of sudden cardiac death. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011;4(4):441-7.
17. Barbhaiya C, Po JR, Hanon S, Schweitzer P. Tpeak – Tend and Tpeak - Tend/QT ratio as markers of ventricular arrhythmia risk in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2013;36(1):103-8.
18. Haarmark C, Hansen PR, Vedel-Larsen E, Pedersen SH, Graff C, Andersen MP, et al. The prognostic value of the Tpeak-Tend interval in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Electrocardiol. 2009;42(6):555-60.
19. Castro-Torres Y, Carmona-Puerta R, Katholi RE. Ventricular repolarization markers for predicting malignant arrhythmias in clinical practice. World J Clin Cases. 2015;3(8):705-20.
20. Smits JP, Eckardt L, Probst V, Bezzina CR, Schott JJ, Remme CA, et al. Genotype-phenotype relationship in Brugada syndrome: electrocardiographic features differentiate SCN5A-related patients from non-SCN5A-related patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40(2):350-6.
21. Yokokawa M, Noda T, Okamura H, Satomi K, Suyama K, Kurita T, et al. Comparison of long-term follow-up of electrocardiographic features in Brugada syndrome between the SCN5A-positive probands and the SCN5A-negative probands. Am J Cardiol. 2007;100(4):649-55.
22. Watanabe H, Nogami A, Ohkubo K, Kawata H, Hayashi Y, Ishikawa T, et al. Electrocardiographic characteristics and SCN5A mutations in idiopathic ventricular fibrillation associated with early repolarization. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011;4(6):874-81.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.