The clinical method and the growing technological presence in cardiology: Are they mutually exclusive?

Authors

  • Suilbert Rodríguez Blanco Policlínico “Nguyen Van Troi”. Centro Habana. La Habana, Cuba.
  • Javier Almeida Gómez Servicio de Cardiología. Hospital “Hermanos Ameijeiras”. La Habana, Cuba.
  • Jeddú Cruz Hernández Instituto de Endocrinología. La Habana, Cuba.
  • Daniel Martínez Ávila Policlínico “Luis Galván”. Centro Habana. La Habana, Cuba.

Abstract

Hippocrates was the one who gave life to the clinical method, by insisting on the supreme value of observing the patients and the accumulation of experience by the physician to make a correct diagnosis of diseases. Obtaining clinical information and its interpretation are two moments of the process of medical care, which are closely related. From them, some components are derived, such as the doctor-patient relationship, anamnesis, physical examination and medical history. Together with this, there is a technological modernism in medical sciences, which is inevitable given its progress; but it should not involve an abandonment of the clinical method, because it would violate the ethical and medical principles that have been in place since the time of Hippocrates. Some thoughts on the components of the clinical method, the technological presence in modern cardiology and the relationship between them are expressed, based on the unquestionable validity and importance of this method and the duty of health professionals to put it into practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2014-07-04

How to Cite

1.
Rodríguez Blanco S, Almeida Gómez J, Cruz Hernández J, Martínez Ávila D. The clinical method and the growing technological presence in cardiology: Are they mutually exclusive?. CorSalud [Internet]. 2014 Jul. 4 [cited 2025 Jun. 22];6(3):235-4. Available from: https://revcorsalud.sld.cu/index.php/cors/article/view/70

Issue

Section

SPECIAL ARTICLES